Feature Request List
Difference (last change) (Author, normal page display)
Deleted: 26,27d25
various, various, Keyword to access the outer object from an inner class, .outer property added (![]() ![]() others... |
Deleted: 30,31d27
2005/06/14, RodolfoBorges?, foreach over list of values specified inline, achieved by implementing array literals (![]() ![]() |
Deleted: 34,35d29
2005/05/25, MichaelButscher?, Arbitrary template value parameters, ![]() ![]() |
Deleted: 48,49d41
2005/01/21, AndersFBjörklund, "isnot" keyword, !is added instead (![]() ![]() |
Deleted: 54,55d45
2004/11/29, AndersFBjörklund, void main should return 0, ![]() ![]() |
Deleted: 62,63d51
2004/10/15, AndersFBjörklund, "str" aliases (std.stdstr) StdTypeAliases, string added instead (![]() ![]() |
Deleted: 66,67d53
2004/10/12, AndersFBjörklund, true and false should be "bool" - not bit, ![]() ![]() |
Deleted: 74,75d59
2004/08/14, JustinCalvarese, Predefined Pragma for library linkage, ![]() ![]() |
Deleted: 78,79d61
2004/07/18, Matthew, autotype keyword (type is deduced at compile time) Similar to auto proposal in C++ 0.x., added in ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Deleted: 88,89d69
2004/06/13, Antti, Array Literals, implemented in ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Deleted: 96,97d75
2004/04/25, Achilleas Margaritis, Signal and Slot as language feature, added to Phobos as part of ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Deleted: 112,113d89
various, various, Default Arguments, ![]() |
Deleted: 129,130d104
2003/11/26, Mark Brudnak, Variable Argument Lists, ![]() ![]() |
Deleted: 135,138d108
2003/09/13, <n>DeadCow?</n>, Tuples,dormant, ![]() 2003/08/27, HelmutLeitner, Array Reserve, dormant, ? |
Deleted: 145,146d114
2002/18/10, Patrick Down, Mixins, ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Deleted: 160,167d127
==Discussion= If you want to include a lot of discussion about one of these features, you should create a subpage in the wiki (such as what I did with default arguments and variant argument list). -- JustinCalvarese With a separate detail page that gives people room to comment and improve on the idea too. -- BillyZelsnack |
Deleted: 174,187d133
==Voting== Do we want to keep track of people's opinion regarding single features? It would make it easy to see which feature request has much priority for the community. -- BenjaminHerr I think it would be a good idea to do this. -- HelmutLeitner Anonymous "votes" are rather dangerous, but putting the names of people would bloat the table a lot. Do we want a sub page for each feature with a discussion and votes? -- BenjaminHerr Since D isn't a democracy (or even a representive republic), I don't know how helpful it is to have voting. Anonymous voting on a wiki sounds like trouble. Named votes on a subpage sounds reasonable, but it might be better just to post a poll topic for the feature in question in the ![]() But I am certain that even the all-authoritative Walter will be interested in the community's collective opinion of certain features. Perhaps it makes more sense to call it "sub-pages to discuss features, also votes" to make it sound a bit more productive. The phpBB will probably scroll away the poll after a while, which does not appear terribly useful. -- BenjaminHerr |
Deleted: 191,193d136
To make these official shouldn't they be reported as issues here ![]() Someone who was at the D conference (Aug 2007) should update this page with whatever came out of it. |
This is here for archive reasons, new requests should be created as a DIP.
There is another wish list around which seems to have been updated more recently.
See http://all-technology.com/eigenpolls/dwishlist/
![]() |
|
status should be "open" or the action taken or expressed by Walter:
open[: comment]
implemented[: comment]
accepted[: comment]
rejected[: comment]
ignored[: comment]
Subpages
All the subpages are listed here automatically (in order of most recent change):
![]() |
|
FolderDiscussions